It's the discussion about the reaction of some people in the UK regarding their impending social media ban for under 16s that bugged me most. Most noteably was the hand-waving around "the gov is just trying to siphon up all our IDs" and "this means everyone will have to show ID, not just under 16s". If only there was another precedent somewhere in the world where precisely this model was rolled... oh - wait! 🐨 The way the ban (sorry - "delay") has been done in Australia isn't perfect, but it also doesn't have to be. There are still plenty of under 16s with access so socials, but I do not know of a single adult who had had to show any form of ID or do any age verification whatsoever. So, relax, wait until we know more about how thye're planning to do it (and the UK gov will be closely looking at the Aussie precedent), and then lose your minds if it's done totally differently at the expense of everyone's privacy.
Weekly update- Homepage
- International
- Weekly Update 488
Related
Name That Toon: Mark of (Cybersecurity) Progress
11 hours ago
2
Asia's Cyber Insurance Market Shows Signs of Life
17 hours ago
5
'The Com' Cyberattacks Support Violence & Sexploitation
20 hours ago
5
Name That Toon Contest
1 day ago
13
Dutch Raid Fails to Dent Russian Bulletproof Host
1 day ago
14
Agentic AI Isn't Risky; the Way Orgs Deploy It Is
1 day ago
17






.png?width=1280&auto=webp&quality=80&disable=upscale)



